unvarnished

culturalrebel:

There are legit white fans of Sleepy Hollow whining about this show’s well-deserved death because ‘we’ didn’t give season four a chance. 

These are the same motherfuckers who were so sure that the show could continue without Nicole Beharie and without the predominantly Black female audience that had poured so much love and time and effort into keeping this show alive. 

So shut the fuck up about the #SleepyHollowIsOverParty and how we shouldn’t laugh at the poor racist showrunners who don’t have jobs.

We will laugh and rejoice.

We have earned the fucking right.

Hey, I’m white. And old. 

Loved the first season, although it was not perfect. Season 2 was bad–why concentrate on the dull characters & sideline the interesting ones? To appeal to the white audience? Didn’t work for me. Season 3, not much better. Planned to catch the last episode on Hulu but skipped it when I heard of Abbie’s demise. Yes, the actress wanted to leave; they should not have mistreated her.  Skipped season 4 totally. 

Best wishes to the cast members. Hear Orlando Jones is doing well on American Gods. Hope the changing showrunners learn their lesson but doubt they will. 

leviheichou-hasaheart:

One of the best parts of reading older material is honestly seeing how different English was. Like I know jack shit about how English has evolved, so really I just gotta guess as to whether or not someone unintentionally fucked up the spelling of a word or if that word has actually changed. For instance, in his statement on the duel between Burr and Hamilton, Van Ness spells Ankle as “Ancle”. Also for whatever reason it was capitalized? At the end of a sentence?

Also I really need to talk about this sign that was under a wax replication of the duel that read

“O Burr, O Burr, what has thou done?
Thou has shooted dead great Hamilton.
You hid behind a bunch of thistle,
And shooted him dead with a great boss pistol.”

I will go to my grave crying over that sign.

Also in Jefferson’s account of the dinner between himself, Madison and Hamilton he spells acknowledge, “acknoleged”. Like… was that how it was really spelled? Or was this joker just a few centuries too early for autocorrect and praying nobody could tell he didn’t know how the fuck to spell that word?

English spelling was less regular in those days.  You can see great variations in letters by those with little education.  But even the educated gentlemen weren’t consistent…..

msilvester233663:
“Fascination of the day . John warren, younger brother of Joseph warren .
”
Very interesting. John Singleton Copley was America’s greatest portraitist–but I find his Joseph Warren unsatisfactory. He wore a wig perched on his natural...

msilvester233663:

Fascination of the day . John warren, younger brother of Joseph warren .

Very interesting.  John Singleton Copley was America’s greatest portraitist–but I find his Joseph Warren unsatisfactory.  He wore a wig perched on his natural hair–as several of Copley’s gentlemen do.  It was a symbol of his profession & position in society–but not flattering. The sober black garments also underline his seriousness.  

image

The problem, of course, is that it’s the only Joseph Warren portrait.   We ought to have several depictions by Charles Willson Peale–none of which resembled each other.  Perhaps a good portrait by Trumbull–and several stately profiles in Trumbull’s murals.  A bust by Houdon (or Ceracci) would have been useful.    Add a few paintings by Gilbert Stuart & the younger Peales.  

Alas, Dr Warren died at Bunker Hill & we wish in vain to know more about the bland young man in oils….

Who was the strangest Founding Father according to the Journal of the American Revolution?

americanna:

One particularly interesting answer: Alexander Hamilton!

“Alexander Hamilton makes the top of my list, simply because of his apparent hypocrisy. He argued and fought for American rights, and once independence was achieved, he wanted to make the United States a country similar to Britain, dominated by a ruling political and financial elite where the people had little voice in the government. He opposed the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution and even suggested breaking up the large states into smaller entities so they could not challenge the national government’s power. He frequently expressed his admiration for the British system of government. If he liked it so much, and tried to recreate it in the United States, why did he bother to support the Revolution in the first place? - Jim Piecuch”

https://allthingsliberty.com/2014/12/strangest-founding-father/

That’s the opinion of one contributor to the excellent Journal of the American Revolution.  Other scholars name other patriots.  Another scholar looks at Hamilton’s attitude to Britain–especially as compared to Jefferson’s. First, he detailed how the tobacco planters of Virginia were chronically in debt to British (English & Scottish) merchants–and, thus, resented them.  He continues:

To add insult to injury, the British had invaded Virginia late in the war. Marauding soldiers had destroyed crops and livestock, including Jefferson’s own, torched the state capital at Richmond, and carried off hundreds of slaves to be set free. Virginia’s Anglophobia, and view of itself as the innocent victim, deepened. After the war, it was only natural for Virginians to use the loss of the slaves as an excuse not to pay their prewar British debts, totaling £2.3 million in 1790. What made Virginia distinctive, however, was that although it had suffered much, it had contributed relatively little in blood and treasure to the national cause, or even to its own defense. Virginians like Henry “Light Horse Harry” Lee (the father of Robert E. Lee), and John Marshall (the future chief justice), not to mention Washington, served with distinction in the Continental Army and became leading Federalists. But the efforts of Governor Jefferson to organize resistance at home had been notably ineffectual, provoking calls for an investigation into his conduct. 

A discerning European visitor, seeking to explain the Anglophilia of Federalists like Hamilton in the mid-1790s, observed that “resentments do not subsist when you have won. Satisfied pride reserves no desire for revenge.” Whether or not Talleyrand realized it, the same psychological principle applied in reverse to Virginia. There people did not have such a clear-cut sense of having won. The struggle for independence from the economic coils of the Mother Country continued after 1783. Nor could one really say that Virginia’s pride had been satisfied or its honor vindicated by its wartime performance. Hence the chip on the shoulder that Virginians carried vis-à-vis the British – let us call it the “Virginia syndrome” – and their recurrent urge to strike another blow.

Harper, John Lamberton. American Machiavelli: Alexander Hamilton and the Origins of U.S. Foreign Policy  

Harper does not see Machiavelli as a demonic plotter, but as a lover of freedom showing how it can be subverted.  And he traces Hamilton’s reputation as it waxed, waned & has waxed again–usually in opposition to Jefferson’s.

Hey, this post may contain adult content, so we’ve hidden it from public view.
Learn more.

Hey, this post may contain adult content, so we’ve hidden it from public view.

Learn more.

historyismyboyfriend:
“Schoonover, Frank E. Painting, Forward! Forward! He Cried! (Lafayette Leading Troops of the VIII Virginia Regiment) First half 20th C., oil on canvas. 1994.86.1. Lora Robins Collection of Virginia Art, Virginia Historical...

historyismyboyfriend:

Schoonover, Frank E. Painting, Forward! Forward! He Cried! (Lafayette Leading Troops of the VIII Virginia Regiment) First half 20th C., oil on canvas. 1994.86.1. Lora Robins Collection of Virginia Art, Virginia Historical Society, Richmond.

sincerely-nadine:
“ Dear America,
On the 4th July 1776, you declared yourselves independent from Britain and by 1783 you had claimed victory over us in the American Revolution, sealing your independence.
On the 30th April 1789, George Washington...

sincerely-nadine:

Dear America,

On the 4th July 1776, you declared yourselves independent from Britain and by 1783 you had claimed victory over us in the American Revolution, sealing your independence.

On the 30th April 1789, George Washington became the first President. 45 Presidents later and you are left with Donald Trump sat in the White House.

You have had your fun and have even come to our aid in the past. Now maybe we should return the favour. How many Americans today would prefer to turn loyalist rather than patriot and dream of ships full of Redcoats on the horizon, coming back to fight and burn the White House down again?

For now we shall sit across the vast Atlantic and wait to see what kind of man Trump is to be, unleashed on the so called “Land of the Free.”

Thanks, but no thanks.  We’ll get rid of Trump fairly soon; alas, the immediate replacement will be Pence.  But we’ll eventually have worthy residents in the White House. 

In the meantime, tend to your Brexit. 

(via sincerely-nadine-deactivated201)

sonofhistory:

While attending a dinner party at Jefferson’s home, Hamilton said he believed the greatest man of all time was Julius Caesar (i.e., the general who overthrew the Roman Republic and installed himself as emperor). Modern historians think he was merely trolling Jefferson, but Jefferson repeated the story to anyone who would listen for the rest of his life, insisting that Hamilton had revealed his true colors that night.

From the Chernow biography:

One of Jefferson’s main weapons in discrediting Hamilton was his own insatiable appetite for political intelligence. After noteworthy discussions, Jefferson scribbled down the contents on scraps of paper. In 1818, he collected these snippets of political chatter into a scrapbook he called his “Anas”— a compendium of table gossip. In these pages, Hamilton figures as the melodramatic villain of the Washington administration, appearing in no fewer than forty-five entries. These horror stories about Hamilton have been regurgitated for two centuries and are now engraved on the memories of historians and readers alike. Unfortunately, these vignettes often cruelly misrepresent Hamilton and have done no small damage to his reputation. Jefferson understood very well the power of laying down a paper trail….

What makes this story suspect, if not downright absurd, is that Hamilton’s collected papers are teeming with pejorative references to Julius Caesar. In fact, whenever Hamilton wanted to revile Jefferson as a populist demagogue, he invariably likened him to Julius Caesar. One suspects that if Hamilton was accurately quoted, he was joking with Jefferson.

 TJ had long years to burnish his reputation as The Sage of Monticello. And to demean Hamilton.  Who did not get those long years. 

Indeed, “who lives, who dies, who tells your story?” 

fearless-seas:

image

It’s a good message.  But why use a picture of the Signing of the Declaration of Independence? 

This one again?
Mount Vernon’s excellent website includes a page of Spurious Quotations. Including this one:
“ This quote is partially accurate as the beginning section is taken from Washington’s First Annual Message to Congress on the State of the...

This one again? 

Mount Vernon’s excellent website includes a page of Spurious Quotations.  Including this one:

This quote is partially accurate as the beginning section is taken from Washington’s First Annual Message to Congress on the State of the Union. However, the quote is then manipulated into a differing context and the remaining text is inaccurate. Here is the actual text from Washington’s speech:

“A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies.”

Washington was urging US manufacture of arms, among other enterprises.  To find his attitude toward rebellion against his government, look up the Whiskey Rebellion.  Or read this–if research is too difficult for you. 

image
tinyjacobin:
“ This guy is Tadeusz Kosciuszko and honestly he’s one of my favorite figures in the American Revolution, and in history in general. His story is very interesting and, in terms of his role in the American Revolution, he’s vastly...

tinyjacobin:

This guy is Tadeusz Kosciuszko and honestly he’s one of my favorite figures in the American Revolution, and in history in general. His story is very interesting and, in terms of his role in the American Revolution, he’s vastly underrated. Born in Poland, he happened to be in France when the American Revolution broke out and efforts were being made to recruit officers there. While the war appealed to many French nobles as an opportunity for military glory, Kosciuszko was drawn in because of his support for Enlightenment values, human rights, and national sovereignty, influenced by his experience of growing up in Poland during a time of civil war and encroaching foreign powers. As an engineer and colonel, his contributions to the revolution were invaluable. After the war he returned to Europe and led a failed but significant revolt in his own country. He became close friends with Thomas Jefferson, who wrote that Kosciuszko was “the purest son of liberty… that I have ever known”. In his will, he set aside the money he received for his contributions in the American Revolution so that Jefferson could free his slaves. Spoiler: Jefferson still didn’t free them and I’m quite angry about this. Sadly, Kosciuszko died exiled from his home country, unsuccessful in his efforts to prevent Russia’s conquest of the Polish-Lithuanian Conquest or emancipate his peasants (Tsar Alexander refused), but his work was not forgotten and inspired future generations. Like Lafayette, he was truly a hero of two worlds.

The painting is Kosciuszko at West Point by B.J. Czedekowski (1947)

scienceisbeauty:
“ Bob Dylan, simply masterful in his Banquet Speech: Good evening, everyone. I extend my warmest greetings to the members of the Swedish Academy and to all of the other distinguished guests in attendance tonight.
I’m sorry I can’t be...

scienceisbeauty:

Bob Dylan, simply masterful in his Banquet Speech:

Good evening, everyone. I extend my warmest greetings to the members of the Swedish Academy and to all of the other distinguished guests in attendance tonight.

I’m sorry I can’t be with you in person, but please know that I am most definitely with you in spirit and honored to be receiving such a prestigious prize. Being awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature is something I never could have imagined or seen coming. From an early age, I’ve been familiar with and reading and absorbing the works of those who were deemed worthy of such a distinction: Kipling, Shaw, Thomas Mann, Pearl Buck, Albert Camus, Hemingway. These giants of literature whose works are taught in the schoolroom, housed in libraries around the world and spoken of in reverent tones have always made a deep impression. That I now join the names on such a list is truly beyond words.

I don’t know if these men and women ever thought of the Nobel honor for themselves, but I suppose that anyone writing a book, or a poem, or a play anywhere in the world might harbor that secret dream deep down inside. It’s probably buried so deep that they don’t even know it’s there.

If someone had ever told me that I had the slightest chance of winning the Nobel Prize, I would have to think that I’d have about the same odds as standing on the moon. In fact, during the year I was born and for a few years after, there wasn’t anyone in the world who was considered good enough to win this Nobel Prize. So, I recognize that I am in very rare company, to say the least.

I was out on the road when I received this surprising news, and it took me more than a few minutes to properly process it. I began to think about William Shakespeare, the great literary figure. I would reckon he thought of himself as a dramatist. The thought that he was writing literature couldn’t have entered his head. His words were written for the stage. Meant to be spoken not read. When he was writing Hamlet, I’m sure he was thinking about a lot of different things: “Who’re the right actors for these roles?” “How should this be staged?” “Do I really want to set this in Denmark?” His creative vision and ambitions were no doubt at the forefront of his mind, but there were also more mundane matters to consider and deal with. “Is the financing in place?” “Are there enough good seats for my patrons?” “Where am I going to get a human skull?” I would bet that the farthest thing from Shakespeare’s mind was the question “Is this literature?”

When I started writing songs as a teenager, and even as I started to achieve some renown for my abilities, my aspirations for these songs only went so far. I thought they could be heard in coffee houses or bars, maybe later in places like Carnegie Hall, the London Palladium. If I was really dreaming big, maybe I could imagine getting to make a record and then hearing my songs on the radio. That was really the big prize in my mind. Making records and hearing your songs on the radio meant that you were reaching a big audience and that you might get to keep doing what you had set out to do.

Well, I’ve been doing what I set out to do for a long time, now. I’ve made dozens of records and played thousands of concerts all around the world. But it’s my songs that are at the vital center of almost everything I do. They seemed to have found a place in the lives of many people throughout many different cultures and I’m grateful for that.

But there’s one thing I must say. As a performer I’ve played for 50,000 people and I’ve played for 50 people and I can tell you that it is harder to play for 50 people. 50,000 people have a singular persona, not so with 50. Each person has an individual, separate identity, a world unto themselves. They can perceive things more clearly. Your honesty and how it relates to the depth of your talent is tried. The fact that the Nobel committee is so small is not lost on me.

But, like Shakespeare, I too am often occupied with the pursuit of my creative endeavors and dealing with all aspects of life’s mundane matters. “Who are the best musicians for these songs?” “Am I recording in the right studio?” “Is this song in the right key?” Some things never change, even in 400 years.

Not once have I ever had the time to ask myself, “Are my songs literature?”

So, I do thank the Swedish Academy, both for taking the time to consider that very question, and, ultimately, for providing such a wonderful answer.

My best wishes to you all,
Bob Dylan

Banquet speech by Bob Dylan, Nobel Laureate in Literature 2016, presented at the Nobel Banquet by the United States Ambassador to Sweden Azita Raji.

© The Nobel Foundation 2016

General permission is granted for immediate publication in editorial contexts, in print or online, in any language within two weeks of December 10, 2016. Thereafter, any publication requires the consent of the Nobel Foundation. On all publications in full or in major parts the above copyright notice must be applied.

Via the Nobel Prize FB page

Also unforgettable the Presentation Speech by Professor Horace Engdahl

(via heyjules64)